Hello,
I am using ReportViewer in a web application. When there is a chart as part
of a report and it is exported to PDF the file size is very large for a
single page; typically 10-12 Mb.
I am now supposed to manufacture a report that will be about 50 pages with a
large graph on each page and I don't thing a 500Mb file size is acceptable.
Isn't there a way for the charts to use a vector format instead or at least
a compressed format?
Thanks,
JohnI've noticed a similar strange behavior with PDF and charts with RS 2005.
I've had situations where the PDF download never ends :)
So for charts we have people export to TIFF.
It looks to be a bug with RS 2005.
"JPS" wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using ReportViewer in a web application. When there is a chart as part
> of a report and it is exported to PDF the file size is very large for a
> single page; typically 10-12 Mb.
> I am now supposed to manufacture a report that will be about 50 pages with a
> large graph on each page and I don't thing a 500Mb file size is acceptable.
> Isn't there a way for the charts to use a vector format instead or at least
> a compressed format?
> Thanks,
> John|||I have the same issue. We are creating a report with three charts, and it is
20 MB total file size. We are using local reports in an Asp .Net 2.0 page.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Sam
"Carmine" wrote:
> I've noticed a similar strange behavior with PDF and charts with RS 2005.
> I've had situations where the PDF download never ends :)
> So for charts we have people export to TIFF.
> It looks to be a bug with RS 2005.
> "JPS" wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using ReportViewer in a web application. When there is a chart as part
> > of a report and it is exported to PDF the file size is very large for a
> > single page; typically 10-12 Mb.
> >
> > I am now supposed to manufacture a report that will be about 50 pages with a
> > large graph on each page and I don't thing a 500Mb file size is acceptable.
> >
> > Isn't there a way for the charts to use a vector format instead or at least
> > a compressed format?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
No comments:
Post a Comment