I've read Mr. Cotter's article on full-text search and as with several other
folks, he mentions the use of the following commands to allow the adobe pdf
ifilter to be used.
exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 1;
exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 0;
This works fine. However, a few articles I've read suggest that after you
have added the ifilter, you should restore these less secure values back to
exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 0;
exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 1;
Because I want to keep my SQL Server secure, I have run these statements.
However after stopping and starting SQL Server or rebooting, the pdf ifilter
is no longer available to SQL Server full text search. Therefore, no new
pdf's are indexed. Is this the expected behavior? If so, What good is it to
restore the values if you can't index new documents. On the other hand, how
can you justify the security risk by not restoring the values to their more
secure state? Am I missing something here?
Can you direct me to the articles which suggest you can re-enable the
verification of the signatures. My understanding is that these signatures
are verified each time SQL Server or MSFTESQL starts. This is the suggested
behavior.
The danger is that one of the iFilters you load could be a victim of a
buffer overflow or another exploit . While the risk of this happening if
real it is really quite unlikely.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Dlorbecki" <Dlorbecki@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:DCB580BC-BAC1-47EB-A2A0-F67958DEA29E@.microsoft.com...
> I've read Mr. Cotter's article on full-text search and as with several
> other
> folks, he mentions the use of the following commands to allow the adobe
> pdf
> ifilter to be used.
> exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 1;
> exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 0;
> This works fine. However, a few articles I've read suggest that after you
> have added the ifilter, you should restore these less secure values back
> to
> exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 0;
> exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 1;
> Because I want to keep my SQL Server secure, I have run these statements.
> However after stopping and starting SQL Server or rebooting, the pdf
> ifilter
> is no longer available to SQL Server full text search. Therefore, no new
> pdf's are indexed. Is this the expected behavior? If so, What good is it
> to
> restore the values if you can't index new documents. On the other hand,
> how
> can you justify the security risk by not restoring the values to their
> more
> secure state? Am I missing something here?
|||Here's one link:
http://activeobjects.blogspot.com/2006/01/sharepoint-services-sql-2005-and-pdf.html
Are you saying not to run the latter two commands? My experience is that
after you do, the pdf ifilter does not function for new documents. However,
then you have the dilemma of the security hole.
"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> Can you direct me to the articles which suggest you can re-enable the
> verification of the signatures. My understanding is that these signatures
> are verified each time SQL Server or MSFTESQL starts. This is the suggested
> behavior.
> The danger is that one of the iFilters you load could be a victim of a
> buffer overflow or another exploit . While the risk of this happening if
> real it is really quite unlikely.
> --
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
> "Dlorbecki" <Dlorbecki@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:DCB580BC-BAC1-47EB-A2A0-F67958DEA29E@.microsoft.com...
>
>
sql
Showing posts with label sp_fulltext_service. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sp_fulltext_service. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
pdf ifilter issue with sp_fulltext_service
Several internet posts I've read describe how to get SQL Server to recognize
a 3rd party ifilter .dll. This involves the use of sp_fulltext_service with
the following syntax:
Exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 0
Exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 1
I've used these commands and have been able to get SQL Server and SharePoint
to build an index for pdf documents. Many of these instructions tell you to
reverse the settings after you're finished in order to better secure the
server. Those commands are:
-- Restore the Full-text service settings to their default
Exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 1
Exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 0
The problem is, that once you run the above commands and reboot, you no
longer index any new pdf files added to the server. Is this the expected
behavior? If not, what am I doing wrong? I don't want to leave the security
hole open by not running these commands but then you don't index new files.
This is a duplicate post I created because I did not see my original after a
day of waiting. Please disregard this post and use the other. Thanks.
"Dlorbecki" wrote:
> Several internet posts I've read describe how to get SQL Server to recognize
> a 3rd party ifilter .dll. This involves the use of sp_fulltext_service with
> the following syntax:
> Exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 0
> Exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 1
> I've used these commands and have been able to get SQL Server and SharePoint
> to build an index for pdf documents. Many of these instructions tell you to
> reverse the settings after you're finished in order to better secure the
> server. Those commands are:
> -- Restore the Full-text service settings to their default
> Exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 1
> Exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 0
> The problem is, that once you run the above commands and reboot, you no
> longer index any new pdf files added to the server. Is this the expected
> behavior? If not, what am I doing wrong? I don't want to leave the security
> hole open by not running these commands but then you don't index new files.
>
a 3rd party ifilter .dll. This involves the use of sp_fulltext_service with
the following syntax:
Exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 0
Exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 1
I've used these commands and have been able to get SQL Server and SharePoint
to build an index for pdf documents. Many of these instructions tell you to
reverse the settings after you're finished in order to better secure the
server. Those commands are:
-- Restore the Full-text service settings to their default
Exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 1
Exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 0
The problem is, that once you run the above commands and reboot, you no
longer index any new pdf files added to the server. Is this the expected
behavior? If not, what am I doing wrong? I don't want to leave the security
hole open by not running these commands but then you don't index new files.
This is a duplicate post I created because I did not see my original after a
day of waiting. Please disregard this post and use the other. Thanks.
"Dlorbecki" wrote:
> Several internet posts I've read describe how to get SQL Server to recognize
> a 3rd party ifilter .dll. This involves the use of sp_fulltext_service with
> the following syntax:
> Exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 0
> Exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 1
> I've used these commands and have been able to get SQL Server and SharePoint
> to build an index for pdf documents. Many of these instructions tell you to
> reverse the settings after you're finished in order to better secure the
> server. Those commands are:
> -- Restore the Full-text service settings to their default
> Exec sp_fulltext_service 'verify_signature', 1
> Exec sp_fulltext_service 'load_os_resources', 0
> The problem is, that once you run the above commands and reboot, you no
> longer index any new pdf files added to the server. Is this the expected
> behavior? If not, what am I doing wrong? I don't want to leave the security
> hole open by not running these commands but then you don't index new files.
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)